Hello Leuchtturm1917, goodbye Moleskine!

Sometimes something good comes out of an unpleasant surprise.

Yesterday I filled a Moleskine large squared notebook, and opened up the spare I’d been carrying. I opened the book and realized something was wrong. The grid lines were really thick and dark. Not the unobtrusive light gray they used to be, but a very dark gray that will compete with most of the pens I use, and would overwhelm a pencil. See the picture below (the new style is on top, old style is on the bottom):



I filled out a quality control form at Moleskine and have requested a replacement. We’ll see what happens. Ever since Moleskine moved their production to China [Actually, they didn’t. See below.] every book is a little different than the previous one. The cover feels different, or the binding is tight, or it smells funny, or something. That they added QC stickers to the books so they can track them suggests they know they have quality control issues.

With no new notebooks to continue my journalling, and feeling a little burnt by Moleskine, I went looking for an alternative. While I was looking I found Leuchtturm1917 on the Fountain Pen Network.

I remember the first time I saw a Moleskine notebook. It was in 2001 in the Atlanta airport, and there was a little store in the middle that sold pens and paper. I bought a few of the pocket size and was so impressed with them I almost couldn’t write in them. The design, the placeholder, band, pocket and the rest that we now all take for granted were not very common then and it seemed so incredibly high quality. With this change in the ruling I decided to try something new and ordered the Leuchtturm1917.

I have the same feeling about the Leuchtturm1917 that I had with my first Moleskine. It’s everything a Moleskine is and more. It has a nicer ribbon, is available in dot ruling (in the same 5mm spacing as the Moleskine grid) as well as normal and grid ruling. It has page numbers, and even a table of contents. I’m not crazy about the eight detachable sheets in the back, but they may come in handy. The book is slightly larger – 15mm wider. Another nice touch is that it DOESN’T assume you will offer a reward for the book. It even comes with stickers to label the book with.

The Moleskine has 240 pages, where the Leuchtturm has 249 numbered pages. The perforations start on page 235, so 234 pages are not perforated and that’s not counting the table of contents. The Leuchtturm has 38 writing lines per page, versus 40 on the Moleskine. The Leuchtturm is about 15mm wider on each page than the Moleskine, which means the Leuchtturm has about 1,289 meters of writing lines on non-perfed pages, the Moleskine has 1,248. The Leuchtturm has an extra un-numbered page at each end of the book, that joins the cover to the body of the book. In the Moleskine these are counted in the 240, but they are hard to write on because they’re glued to the cover pages. So the Leuchtturm not only has more space but it’s all normal pages.

The registration of the ruling on the page is very consistent on the one I have, which is another area where Moleskine is now falling short – see the comparison of old and new Moleskine grid below. On the new Moleskine on top you can see the ruling jumps all over, where the old style on the bottom has nice consistent lines.


Last but not least the Leuchtturm1917 is about the same price on Amazon – about forty cents more. The Leuchtturm1917 is better in every way, with negligible additional cost.

So I discovered Moleskine’s quality had taken another slip downward, and in the process found a replacement that is better than the original. Hello Leuchtturm1917, goodbye Moleskine!

[Update 10/11/2011 – I received a great email from the folks at Kikkerland Design, who brought Moleskines into the US back in 1999. It turns out the Moleskines were always made in China, so they never moved their production there. I know I’m not the only person to think they had, and I’m not sure how it got started, but I felt it important to correct it. I do know their quality/consistency has slipped over the years.

The Leuchtturm1917 is made in Taiwan, which is arguably a better environment than China. However, I’d be willing to pay a few dollars more for one made here. Crane’s paper, 100% cotton, in about 18lb grade, with the Leuchtturm design…maybe a joint venture…]

21 thoughts on “Hello Leuchtturm1917, goodbye Moleskine!

  1. I also switched from Moleskine squared to the Leuchtturm1917 this summer, although I did explore the WhiteLines notebooks as well but found the gray backgound too dark for my liking. The leuchtturm1917 have turned out to be a great purchase and my favorite for work and personal journals.


    1. I too bought a small Whitelines book, but I found it stiff and dark. Really, the binding was more the problem than the background.

      The more I use the dots, the more I love them.


  2. I too, have given up and Moleskine. I have gone to the Rhodia Webbie in the dot grid. The paper is absolutely the best, and the more I use them, the more I like them. They have become my notebook of choice.


  3. I recently acquired a Leucht. 5×8 daily planner. It’s a complicated experiment, attempting to replace my 20 years of Franklin dayplanner addiction. Observations are mostly con because that’s what I am aware of at the moment:
    1. The time reference is military/Zulu/Euro in hundreds of hours. Not a problem for me, that’s how I think.
    2. the time blocks are hours but they really need to be in 30-minute blocks. A simple gray line that bisects each hour would be sufficient.
    3. the ink is a light gray and is invisible in a dimly lit conference room.
    4. There is no to-do list area and the tiny notes area is unlined.
    5. A simple vertical light gray line bisecting the entire page would provide a useful notes area. I usually draw one in pencil.
    6. The paper does not bleed or feather much but is nearly transparent making my fountain pens almost useless. Even pencil shows through.
    7. Saturday and Sunday are squished onto a single page. A problem if your life is not nailed to a conventional week.
    8. The reference weeks start on Monday, as is the European tradition. It takes a bit of adjustment visually.
    9. The fluffy stuff that is included to fill out the remaining signature pages is unusually formatted. Perhaps if you are of Germanic stock it will be more familiar. For me, the pages would be more valuable if simply lined.


    1. Hi David,

      Thanks for the comment! I think nearly anything that you use to replace a 20-year habit is going to take some getting used to. I used a Daytimer for short period, but since my appointments have been mostly in Outlook I use planners only for record notes on a few things.

      What made you want to switch?


  4. I’ve give up on Moleskine for a while now. Leuchtturm1917 is a lot better, especially for fountain pen users. Their pages don’t bleed. In addition, they have a few advantages (and no disadvantages!) over the Moleskine:
    1. better paper
    2. pages are numbered
    3. Includes labels for spin and front cover to easily label these books
    4. Has dotted version which Moleskine doesn’t
    5. cheaper in price than Moleskine!
    6. includes several content pages

    What’s not to love? I can’t think of how else these books can be improved. They’re just fantastic!


    1. Hi Mattheous,

      As I recall, Piccadilly used to be sold by Borders stores in the US. Of course Border is out of business, so I’m not sure where that leaves Piccadilly. Piccadilly wasn’t a direct to consumer company, so I don’t think they ever had a website you could order directly from.


  5. I’m looking forward to using my new grid-ruled Leuchtturm1917 notebook thanks to some comments left on Amazon for the Moleskine equivalent. Those comments led me here. Thank you, Steve, for making sure I make the right choice for me. (Though it cost me nearly $24, which was more than the Moleskine, but I’m going to use this thing every day as a Bullet Journal so it will more than earn its worth!) Until we have a “Made in USA” equivalent, right? Right. Happy New Year!


    1. Hi Brian – thanks for the comment & kind words!

      I don’t think the Leuchtturm1917 will disappoint. They’re well made books with good features. They’re only fault is being hard to find.

      So what’s a bullet journal? Are you recording the performance of various load combinations, or is ‘bullet journal’ a euphemism for something?


  6. Haha, no weapons or euphemisms here! Bullet journaling is basically an organizational method for both scheduling and keeping a record of one’s life. I learned about it through Pinterest. (Which, if you don’t know what Pinterest is, I would describe as social/public website bookmarking.) There’s a website, of course! http://www.bulletjournal.com/ The video is short too, under 3 minutes.

    I started using it last year, admittedly inconsistently. I’ll do better this year. I like being able to have everything in one place, one notebook. I’m able to record bloom times of plants in my garden, note the weather, keep track of friends’ and relatives’ birthdays, doodle, and also make little daily task lists and epic life goal lists. Sure, there’s probably an app for this, but this way I’m not dedicating as much time to which emoticon best describes my feelings about that movie I saw.

    I color code things, add traditional calendars, and make the bullet journal system my own. I’m looking forward to my fresh Leuchtturm1917’s arrival later this week!

    (Also, for some reason I can’t see any of the comments here, though it shows that there are 16 of them. I assume you have it set this way to thwart spam posts, but I just wanted to let you know.)


  7. Would you really prefer 100% cotton pages? I like it for making art prints, but I’m not sure how I’d feel about writing on it with many of my pens. I’m sort of kind of investigating the possibility of getting a hybrid dot grid notebook made in the US. For me it would have to have a competitive price and have better paper than a Moleskine or Leuctturm. I think part of the cost savings may be getting rid of the “frills” like numbered pages, back pockets, and elastic closures. Maybe some people really need that stuff, but I mostly want good paper. That’s probably why I own more sketchbooks than notebooks, but alas they nearly always come only blank.


    1. Hi John – Thanks for writing! I think Leuchtturm has better paper than Moleskine, but I got back and forth over dots and plain these days. The bookfactory notebooks are sturdy and hold up well, but the paper has a softer finish than the others. Better for pencil and ballpoint, not so great for wetter fountain pens.

      But, to answer the question, I’m not that wound up over paper quality anymore, and 100% cotton doesn’t add the durability I thought it did.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s